What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

+ for

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

Why do women wear less clothes compared to men?

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Free agent LB Germaine Pratt agrees to terms with Raiders - NBC Sports

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

in structures, such as:

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill - CNN

a b i 1 x []

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

Tampering & Pettiness?! Golden Knights-Marner Saga Takes Dramatic Twist - Vegas Hockey Now

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …